עבר סימטריות: גיוון קוגניטיבי ומחלוקת סוכנים בדגמי שפה קטנים

תקציר מקורי באנגליתarXiv:2609.35875v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent debate (MAD) reportedly improves reasoning and factuality over single-model inference, but prior work treats agents as symmetric peers, leaving open what drives the gains. We test the hypothesis that cognitive diversity among agents is the driver, in the setting where the question is still measurable: small open-weight models with benchmark headroom. Across 23 models from eleven vendor families, five tasks, and 5,500+ debate and control runs, we vary diversity along three axes - personas, sampling temperature, and model identity - pairing every debate configuration with a generation-budget-matched majority-vote control. The hypothesis is rejected on every axis. Debate beats single-agent inference (3--7 points where tasks have head