מספרים לראיות: החלטות ניתנות לבדיקה יכולות לשפר את זיהוי הדיפקים הדיברטיביים

תקציר מקורי באנגליתarXiv:2609.08899v3 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Speech deepfakes can mimic a speaker's voice convincingly enough to deceive listeners and automated systems. This has driven strong progress in speech deepfake detection, but most detectors still end with one score per utterance. That score is useful for ranking systems, yet it says little about why a borderline item should be trusted, deferred, or reviewed. Two utterances can fall in the same score band for different reasons, for example because passive and retrieval evidence disagree or because the keyed probe is unavailable. We ask whether the final decision can remain scalar without discarding that provenance. We answer this question with an auditable decision record that carries four aligned cues into a late calibration step: a