כתבה
arXiv cs.CL ·
השוואה בין MeSH של אנשי מקצוע לאוטומטי
Evaluation design conditions the expert-vs-auto MeSH gap: a controlled comparison of bag-of-words and BiomedBERT on the Cohen benchmark
חוקרים בדקו את ההבדלים בין MeSH של אנשי מקצוע לאוטומטי. הם השוו בין ביומדברט לבין שיטת bag-of-words. התוצאות מראות כי ההבדלים תלויים באופן ההערכה.
תקציר מקורי באנגליתarXiv:2607.21685v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: A systematic review begins with someone reading thousands of abstracts to identify the few that are relevant, and classifiers are used to prioritise that reading. Their inputs are often augmented with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH), assigned either by expert indexers weeks or months after publication or by automatic tools at once. To our knowledge the two have not been compared directly as classifier features, and no previous work has asked whether that comparison's outcome depends on how the classifier is evaluated. Using the Cohen et al. (2006) drug-class benchmark on three topics, we characterise a bag-of-words logistic regression classifier (seven reruns) and BiomedBERT (five seeds), then examine how the Statins result changes under alte
קרא במקור המקורי
arxiv.org
פתח כתבה מקורית