הסברה רב-פעילות ב-SHAP: תיאור וביקורת

תקציר מקורי באנגליתarXiv:2601.12654v3 Announce Type: replace Abstract: SHAP explanations are widely used in high-stakes settings to justify decisions, yet they can differ substantially across repeated runs, even when the model, the input instance, and the prediction are held fixed. Prior work has documented disagreement between explanation methods; we show that substantial disagreement arises even within SHAP across reruns of the same estimator on the same trained model and instance. We call this phenomenon explanation multiplicity and develop an evaluation methodology for characterizing it under deployment-realistic computational budgets, combining a dual-seed protocol that compares model-induced and explainer-induced variability, a hierarchy of magnitude-based, rank-based, and set-based metrics, and random