ConflictGuide: שיפור אוטומטי בחקירה כאשר התנהגויות תחרותיות נעשות ויזואליות

תקציר מקורי באנגליתarXiv:2609.39933v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: When designing machine learning models, desirable properties are often in tension: improving one behavior can impair another, so task progress can depend on alleviating the conflict. LLM-based AutoResearch systems, which iteratively edit model code and retain edits based on scalar task-performance feedback, have largely ignored this trade-off. We find that scalar feedback supports broad exploration early in search, but it does not reveal how edits affect competing behaviors. In matched-budget experiments, introducing competing-behavior feedback as task gains diminish increases the share of proposals that improve both behaviors and sustains progress beyond scalar-only plateaus. Obtaining this feedback for a given model requires identifying its