כאשר סדר הדברים חשוב: הטיה של הדובר הראשון והתמודדות באמצעות אישיות בדיון רציף של מספר סוכנים

תקציר מקורי באנגליתarXiv:2609.38964v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Multi-agent debate (MAD) is often used to improve large language model (LLM) reasoning, but sequential debate is rarely a neutral aggregator of agents' opinions. We show that sequential MAD suffers from a pronounced first-speaker bias: agents disproportionately shape the final answer when they speak first. As a result, placing a stronger model after weaker ones can substantially offset its reasoning advantage. We then focus on the disadvantaged strong-agent-last setting and ask whether personality prompting can mitigate this imbalance. Drawing on the Big Five model, we study agreeableness and extraversion as behavioral interventions applied to either the strong or weak side. We find that their effects are trait-specific. Influence consistentl