חריצה: פסיקה חד-כיוונית: פסיקה של LLM שאינה חד-כיוונית

תקציר מקורי באנגליתarXiv:2606.07834v2 Announce Type: replace-cross Abstract: Evidence-grounded fact verification increasingly uses LLM judges to turn evidence into terminal verdicts. Many task contracts deliberately include non-directional verdicts - Conflicting for materially mixed evidence, Not Enough Evidence for absent evidence - so that a system can decline to assert a direction. Returning Supports or Refutes on a claim whose authorized verdict is non-directional is directional overcommitment: a label error whose output is a direction the contract did not authorize. Its conflict instance - both strands present, one of them returned - is Cherry-pick Override (CPO); unlike the insufficiency instance it cannot be repaired by retrieving more, because nothing was missing. On AVeriTeC's gold-Conflicting subse