כתבה
arXiv cs.CL ·
Which Medical Questions Deserve Rationales? Perturbation-Sensitive Selection for Robust QA
תקציר מקורי באנגליתarXiv:2609.09684v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Medical question-answering datasets often contain answer labels, whereas high-quality rationales remain scarce, noisy, or costly to validate. This changes the acquisition question: rather than asking which questions should be labeled, we ask which already-labeled questions should receive rationale supervision under a fixed token budget. We study an offline version of this problem in which candidate rationales are visible to the selector but withheld from downstream training unless selected. We propose root-mean-square Robustness-based Sample Prioritization (RMS-RSP), which perturbs hidden states only at rationale tokens and measures the resulting shift in the gold-versus-best-distractor margin. Across five medical QA datasets, MedGemma-4B-IT,
קרא במקור המקורי
arxiv.org
פתח כתבה מקורית